Friday, February 23, 2018

Excess Ethane Predicted to Exceed Overseas Shipping Capacity


In an earlier blog post (entitled “Some Comments on the US Ethane Supply Status”; on January 24, 2018), I presented information that the US Energy Information Administration expects the US production of ethane to be approximately 1.7 million barrels per day (M b/d) by the end of 2018.   However, the ethane US domestic consumption is expected to be approximately 1.4 M b/d, leaving a 300,000 b/d ethane surplus.

In this current blog, I provide some information on shipping capacity available to transport (export) excess US ethane capacity to foreign markets.  I also do some analyses related to how much of the anticipated US 300,000 b/d ethane surplus these ships can handle in 2020.

In table 1 below are the names of current ships available for shipping ethane, their ethane capacities, and the ships’ owners (operators).  In table 2 are the ethane-transporting ships under construction (or planned) for near-term (2018-2019) commissioning, their capacities, and the ship owners (operators).   The information in the tables is based on Internet searching and may not represent completed listings.


table 1 ship name (operating)
ethane capacity (cubic meters)
ship owner (operator)
aurora
37,000
navigator holdings
eclipse
37,000
navigator holdings
nova
37,000
navigator holdings
prominence
37,000
navigator holdings
js ineos insight
27,500
ineos (evergas)
js ineos invention
27,500
ineos (evergas)
js ineos inspiration
27,500
ineos (evergas)
js ineos ingenuity
27,500
ineos (evergas)
js ineos intrepid
27,500
ineos (evergas)
js ineos innovation
27,500
ineos (evergas)
js ineos intuition
27,500
ineos (evergas)
js ineos independence
27,500
ineos (evergas)
gaschem beluga
38,000
hartman
gaschem orca
38,000
hartman
ethane crystal
87,187
reliance (mol mitsui osk)
ethane emerald
87,187
reliance (mol mitsui osk)
table 2 ship name (planned for 2018/2019 commission)
ethane capacity (cubic meters)
ship owner (operator)
to be named
87,187
reliance (mol mitsui osk)
to be named
87,187
reliance (mol mitsui osk)
to be named
87,187
reliance (mol mitsui osk)
to be named
87,187
reliance (mol mitsui osk)
to be named
95,000
hartman
to be named
38,000
hartman
to be named
32,000
evergas
to be named
32,000
evergas
to be named
32,000
evergas
to be named
32,000
evergas


If the ethane shipping capacities shown in tables 1 and 2 are available in 2020 and the ethane surplus in 2020 will be 300,000 b/d, how much of this 300,000 b/d excess US capacity can be shipped to overseas markets by the shipping capacity represented in tables 1 and 2?

300,000 b/d equates to approximately 17,400,000 cubic meters per year of ethane (300,000 b/d X 3 cubic meters/18.9 barrels X 365 days) (pressurized ethane).   So, how much ethane can the 26 ships identified in the tables transport to foreign markets in a year and how does this amount compare to 17,400,000 cubic meters?

Here are some assumptions used in answering these questions: 1) the ethane will be delivered either to ports in Europe or ports in India or China; 2) a round trip for a ship to a European port is 10,000 miles and takes 30 days; 3) a round trip for a ship going to an India or Chinese port is 20,000 miles and takes 60 days; 4) only the large capacity ships (greater than 80,000 cubic meters will be used for the Asian trade and the others for the European trade; and 5) the ships will be in continued 365-day use.

With these assumptions, each ship should be able to make 12 round trips to European ports (1 shipment per 30 days X 365 days) and each ship going to Asian ports should be able to make 6 round trips during the year (1 shipment per 60 days X 365 days).

With the ship capacities and assumptions given above, the total ethane that can be delivered (exported) to overseas markets in 2020 is approximately 11 million cubic meters as shown in the following table 3:


table 3 ship capacity (cubic meters)
number of annual trips with ethane on board
total potential ethane delivered in 2020 (cubic meters)
27,500
12
330,000
27,500
12
330,000
27,500
12
330,000
27,500
12
330,000
27,500
12
330,000
27,500
12
330,000
27,500
12
330,000
27,500
12
330,000
32,000
12
384,000
32,000
12
384,000
32,000
12
384,000
32,000
12
384,000
37,000
12
444,000
37,000
12
444,000
37,000
12
444,000
37,000
12
444,000
38,000
12
456,000
38,000
12
456,000
38,000
12
456,000
87,187
6
523,122
87,187
6
523,122
87,187
6
523,122
87,187
6
523,122
87,187
6
523,122
87,187
6
523,122
95,000
6
570,000

total
11,028,732


Assuming the assumptions and computations above are reasonably correct, a conclusion is that a large amount of the 2020 excess of ethane will not be able to be exported to overseas markets, e.g., 6.4 million cubic meters (17.4 million cubic meters less 11 cubic meters) due to lack of ship capacity.   And if so, US ethane supply should considerably exceed demand, putting downward pressure on ethane prices.


Wednesday, February 14, 2018

Data on Countries’ International Trade in Chemicals



The table below show the chemical trade ratio for the 20 countries with the highest gross domestic product (GDP) (determined by the World Bank).  The chemical trade ratio is the total chemical trade (exports plus imports) divided by the GDP.  I would think that the trade ratio is a good indicator of the degree of the role that international trading in chemicals plays in a country’s overall economy.   Three countries (Switzerland, Germany, and The Netherlands) have trade ratios that significantly exceed the other countries.

country
 chemical exports (in millions USD)
 chemical imports (in millions USD)
 GDP (in millions USD)
trade ratio
 exports as % of imports
 total chemical trade (in millions USD)
switzerland
 $      93,276
 $          42,709
 $         659,827
21%
218%
 $     135,985
germany
 $    162,775
 $        116,197
 $     1,466,757
19%
140%
 $     278,972
netherlands
 $      55,296
 $          41,579
 $         770,845
13%
133%
 $       96,875
france
 $      72,793
 $          63,682
 $     2,465,454
6%
114%
 $     136,475
spain
 $      29,204
 $          36,349
 $     1,232,088
5%
80%
 $       65,553
italy
 $      45,237
 $          50,508
 $     1,849,970
5%
90%
 $       95,745
south korea
 $      36,075
 $          35,197
 $     1,411,246
5%
102%
 $       71,272
uk
 $      61,972
 $          61,292
 $     2,618,886
5%
101%
 $     123,264
saudia arabia
 $      14,962
 $          14,150
 $         646,438
5%
106%
 $       29,112
canada
 $      25,847
 $          34,770
 $     1,529,760
4%
74%
 $       60,617
mexico
 $         9,600
 $          26,298
 $     1,045,998
3%
37%
 $       35,898
india
 $      33,472
 $          33,317
 $     2,263,522
3%
100%
 $       66,789
russia
 $      13,866
 $          23,147
 $     1,283,162
3%
60%
 $       37,013
turkey
 $         4,708
 $          17,002
 $         847,749
3%
28%
 $       21,710
australia
 $         9,582
 $          17,694
 $     1,204,616
2%
54%
 $       27,276
indonesia
 $         6,895
 $          13,898
 $         932,259
2%
50%
 $       20,793
japan
 $      47,977
 $          56,873
 $     4,939,384
2%
84%
 $     104,850
brazil
 $         9,144
 $          28,823
 $     1,796,187
2%
32%
 $       37,967
united states
 $    153,231
 $        197,631
 $   18,569,100
2%
78%
 $     350,862
china
 $      99,163
 $        108,583
 $   11,199,145
2%
91%
 $     207,746
total
 $ 2,004,774




The table also shows the percentage that chemical exports are of chemical imports.  Percentages greater than 100 indicate countries exporting more chemical products than they import.

The total chemical trade for the 20 countries represent about 73% of the total world chemical trade (which is about $2.7 trillion).

The export and import data given above were obtained from the World Bank’s World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS) website. (Click here to go to that website’s section dealing with chemical trade.)     The GDP data was obtained from a Wikipedia site (click here to go to that site).  Chemical products are those identified in the United Nations’ system “Standard International Trade Classification – Chemicals (Section 5)”.

Thursday, February 1, 2018

Chemical and Metal Shortage Alert – January 2018

The purpose of this blog is to identify chemical and metal shortages reported on the Internet.  The sources of the information reported here are primarily news releases issued on the Internet.  The issue period of the news releases is January 2018.

Section I below lists those chemicals and metals that were on the previous month’s Chemical and Metal Shortage Alert list and continue to have news releases indicating they are in short supply. Click here to read the December 2017 Chemical and Metal Shortage Alert list.

Section II lists the new chemicals and metals (not on the December alert).  Also provided is some explanation for the shortage and geographical information.  This blog attempts to list only actual shortage situations – those shortages that are being experienced during the period covered by the news releases.  Chemicals and metals identified in news releases as only being in danger of being in short supply status are not listed.

Section I.   Natural gas: China; supply not keeping up with demand
      
Section II.   Shortages Reported in January not found on the Previous Month’s List

Citral derivatives: Europe; production not keeping up with demand.
Cobalt: Japan; sources no longer available
Fracking Sand: Texas; mining not keeping up with demand
Iron ore: Odisha, India; mining not keeping up with demand
Palladium: global; supply not keeping up with demand
Vitamin A and E: global; production not keeping up with demand

Reasons for Section II shortages can be broadly categorized as: 

1.  Mining not keeping up with demand: fracking sand; iron ore
2.  Production not keeping up with demand:  citral derivatives; vitamin A and E
3.  Government regulations: none
4.  Sources no longer available: cobalt
5.  Insufficient imports:  none
6.  Supply not keeping up with demand:  palladium