An extensive search of the Internet found that in the 2012
to 2013 time period, approximately $14 to $15 billion is the likely amount
globally spent on animal feed additives.
The following table identifies most, if not all, of the major additive
types, with estimated percentages (estimates found during the Internet search)
spent on those types in the 2012 to 2013 time frame:
animal
feed type
|
sales
percentage for the type
|
total
recent sales usd (millions)
|
amino
acids
|
32%
|
4,900
|
antibiotics
|
27%
|
4,200
|
other
|
16%
|
2,500
|
vitamins
|
9%
|
1,400
|
acidifiers
|
8%
|
1,200
|
enzymes
|
5%
|
730
|
minerals
|
3%
|
400
|
antioxidants
|
1%
|
170
|
100%
|
15,500
|
Compounded average growth rates of amounts spent per year on
the animal feed additives are expected to be about 2% to 4% through
2019/2020. Increasing uses of feed
additives aid needed increases in the industrial production of meat. Such increased production is the only way
to meet the growing global demand for meat.
Feed additives also help to decrease environmental impacts of animal
wastes and increase process safety and meat quality. The additives can enhance weigh gain rates,
prevent/control infectious diseases, and help to ensure healthy animals.
Chemcial companies (and chemical-liked companies) provide
the major proportion of the animal feed additives. Some of the publicly-traded companies that do
so are identified in the following table, along with some financial data:
revenues
(usd) (millions)
|
gross profit
(millions)
|
gpm%
|
operating income (usd) (millions)
|
operating
income %
|
products
|
|
Balchem
|
238.5
|
|
|
34.1
|
14%
|
vitamins
|
CJ
Corporation
|
246.0
|
|
|
11.4
|
5%
|
amino
acids
|
DSM
|
2,471.0
|
|
|
|
|
vitamins carotenoids
enzymes minerals
|
Elanco
|
2,346.6
|
564.2
|
24%
|
|
|
antibiotics growth enhancers
|
Evonik
|
2,570.0
|
|
|
|
|
amino
acids
|
Novozymes
|
281.4
|
|
|
|
|
enzymes
|
Nutreco
|
2,300.0
|
|
|
161.0
|
7%
|
amino
acids vitamins minerals
emulsifiers anti-oxidants digestive enhansers
|
Phibro
|
653.2
|
178.9
|
27%
|
56.7
|
9%
|
antibacterials nutritional products minerals
|
Zoetis
|
479.0
|
|
|
|
|
medicated
feed additives
|
|
|
average
|
26%
|
average
|
9%
|
|
The financial data presented in the above table are found in
annual reports published by the publicly-traded companies. This data is available because the companies
have only an animal feed additive business or have a segment doing substantial
animal feed business and therefore this requires providing data on the business
segment in the reports. Absent amounts in
the table indicate that no data is provided in the reports. For example, in some cases a segment may
include businesses other than animal feed additives, and in such cases,
although revenues are provided for each business, only the total operating
income for the segment is provided.
The average gross profit margin percentages (gpm%) and
operating income percentages, shown in the table, seem to me to be fairly good
results, but not outstanding, for a business.
Other publicly-traded companies that have animal feed
businesses but are not segment businesses and do not report financial results
on the animal feed business include: Ajinomto; BASF; Biovet; Chr. Hansen;
Church & Dwight; Darling Ingredients; Dow; DuPont; Mosaic; and Novus (part
of Mitsui). Private companies that have
substantial animal feed businesses include: Addcon; Alltech; Adisseo; Chareon
Pokphand; China Bluestar (part of ChemChina); Kemin; and Lallemand.
Even though a lot of companies are in the animal feed
additive business, I found that available financial results for this business
are difficult to find.
HOw authentic the data is ?
ReplyDelete