This blog attempts to provide some general financial
comparisons between representative European, United States, and Japanese chemical
companies. Tables 1, 2, and 3, below,
show 2018 financial data for four representative chemical companies from each area.
table 1 Europe performance measure
|
basf
|
clariant
|
dsm
|
evonik
|
average
|
earnings per share
|
6.04
|
1.2
|
7.19
|
2.36
|
4.2
|
price to earnings ratio
|
11.78
|
18.09
|
11.71
|
12.1
|
13.4
|
% dividend yield
|
5.3
|
2.95
|
3.22
|
4.75
|
4.1
|
price/share divided by operating
cash flow/share
|
7.09
|
11.7
|
11.13
|
6.6
|
9.1
|
return on equity %
|
13.04
|
12
|
13.81
|
11.9
|
12.7
|
one-year sales growth %
|
2.37
|
3.86
|
7.36
|
4.5
|
4.5
|
gross profit margin %
|
29.29
|
29.2
|
36.74
|
30.8
|
31.5
|
operating profit margin %
|
9.63
|
8.24
|
13.43
|
9.1
|
10.1
|
net income profit margin %
|
7.5
|
5.28
|
11.64
|
6.2
|
7.7
|
non-current liabilities divided by
equity %
|
75.1
|
92.02
|
41.65
|
116.3
|
81.3
|
sales per employee
|
603,814
|
436,321
|
522,199
|
462,099
|
506,108
|
table 2 United States performance measure
|
eastman
|
huntsman
|
kraton
|
westlake
|
average
|
earnings per share
|
7.56
|
2.54
|
2.1
|
7.66
|
5.0
|
price to earnings ratio
|
9.55
|
8.29
|
12.15
|
8.29
|
9.6
|
% dividend yield
|
3.19
|
3.09
|
0
|
1.45
|
1.9
|
price/share divided by operating
cash flow/share
|
10.25
|
4.47
|
4.46
|
5.83
|
6.3
|
return on equity %
|
18.61
|
23.64
|
8.77
|
16.39
|
16.9
|
one-year sales growth %
|
6.3
|
12.35
|
2.65
|
7.39
|
7.2
|
gross profit margin %
|
24.24
|
21.7
|
28.83
|
23.01
|
24.4
|
operating profit margin %
|
15.29
|
11.07
|
12.48
|
16.31
|
13.8
|
net income profit margin %
|
10.64
|
6.63
|
3.33
|
11.53
|
8.0
|
non-current liabilities divided by
equity %
|
142
|
131
|
241
|
71.48
|
146.4
|
sales per employee
|
700,069
|
940,000
|
1,050,000
|
973,500
|
915,892
|
table 3 Japan performance measure
|
jsr
|
mitsui
|
teijin
|
tosoh
|
average
|
earnings per share
|
1.41
|
3.37
|
2.24
|
2.48
|
2.4
|
price to earnings ratio
|
10.99
|
9.2
|
7.28
|
5.24
|
8.2
|
% dividend yield
|
3.03
|
1.64
|
3.33
|
3.16
|
2.8
|
price/share divided by operating
cash flow/share
|
8.56
|
8.47
|
4.28
|
3.88
|
6.3
|
return on equity %
|
8.8
|
16.29
|
12.44
|
19.34
|
14.2
|
one-year sales growth %
|
8.62
|
9.59
|
12.64
|
10.74
|
10.4
|
gross profit margin %
|
30.84
|
23.29
|
33.25
|
29.3
|
29.2
|
operating profit margin %
|
10.33
|
7.8
|
8.36
|
15.87
|
10.6
|
net income profit margin %
|
8.29
|
5.95
|
5.64
|
11.09
|
7.7
|
non-current liabilities divided by
equity %
|
19.94
|
85.4
|
79.66
|
14.88
|
50.0
|
sales per employee
|
530,073
|
723,792
|
378,733
|
591,507
|
556,026
|
Data are provided for eleven financial performance
indicators. These eleven indicators are commonly
used to evaluate a company’s financial performance. For the monetary data in the tables (earnings
per share and sales per employee), the currency is the US dollar. The data were obtained from each company’s
2018 annual report. For non-current liabilities,
total non-current liabilities (not just financial but also pension and other
non-current liabilities) are used.
Table 4, below, shows the averages of the four companies in each
area (averages taken for tables 1, 2, and 3).
table 4 comparison
|
europe
|
usa
|
japan
|
standout
|
earnings per share
|
4.2
|
5
|
2.4
|
none
|
price to earnings ratio
|
13.4
|
9.6
|
8.2
|
europe
|
% dividend yield
|
4.1
|
1.9
|
2.8
|
europe
|
price/share divided by operating
cash flow/share
|
9.1
|
6.3
|
6.3
|
none
|
return on equity %
|
12.7
|
16.9
|
14.2
|
none
|
one-year sales growth %
|
4.5
|
7.2
|
10.4
|
japan
|
gross profit margin %
|
31.5
|
24.4
|
29.2
|
none
|
operating profit margin %
|
10.1
|
13.8
|
10.6
|
none
|
net income profit margin %
|
7.7
|
8
|
7.7
|
none
|
non-current liabilities divided by
equity %
|
81.3
|
146.4
|
50
|
usa
|
sales per employee
|
506,108
|
915,892
|
556,026
|
usa
|
Table 4 shows that for some of the financial performance
indicators, one area has an average for its four companies that stands out (for
example, a significant percentage difference exists from the averages of the
other two areas).
Here are some comments based on the data in Table 4:
·
The European chemical companies, on average, are
priced higher per share but also provide a significantly better dividend return;
·
Companies in all three areas have good cash flow
(based on reasonably low price per share to operating cash flow per share ratio);
·
Returns on equity are reasonably good for the
companies in three areas;
·
Japan’s one-year sales growth from 2017 to 2018
stands out;
·
Gross profit, operating income, and net income
margin percentages are comparable for the three areas;
·
The USA chemical companies’ total non-current liabilities
exceed their total equity, perhaps a worrisome sign; and
·
On the other hand, the sales per employee is
significantly higher for the USA companies, usually a good sign.
No comments:
Post a Comment