In a previous blog (Biobased Product Markets – Part I; May
29, 2018 – read below), I wrote about the need for city procurement departments
to provide data on the carbon dioxide emission reductions that the departments have
obtained through the cities’ use of biobased products.
Many, perhaps most, biobased products available for purchase
by city procurement departments (and other customers of biobased products) are based
upon the research and product development of chemical companies. Here are some of the biobased products that have
been developed by chemical companies:
when used
|
how used
|
chemical company
|
product function
|
cleaning
|
various
|
DowDupont
|
cleaner solvents
|
cleaning
|
various
|
Eastman
|
disposable wipe fibers
|
cleaning
|
various
|
Henkel
|
surfactants
|
cleaning
|
various
|
Kaneka
|
surfactants
|
construction
|
asphalt
|
ADM
|
additives
|
construction
|
asphalt
|
Arkema
|
additives
|
construction
|
asphalt
|
Cargill
|
additives
|
construction
|
asphalt
|
Kraton
|
additives
|
construction
|
concrete
|
DowDupont
|
sealants
|
construction
|
fixtures
|
Ashland
|
resins
|
construction
|
insulation
|
Convestro
|
foam
|
construction
|
paint
|
PPG
|
additives, resins
|
construction
|
timber
|
Convestro
|
resins/fibers
|
construction
|
various
|
DowDupont
|
adhesives/sealants
|
indoor interiors
|
carpets
|
Rennovia
|
nylon
|
indoor interiors
|
chairs
|
BASF/Corbion
|
polyurethane foam
|
indoor interiors
|
chairs
|
Cargill
|
polyurethane foam
|
indoor interiors
|
chairs
|
Covestro
|
polyurethane foam
|
indoor interiors
|
chairs
|
DowDupont
|
polyurethane foam
|
indoor interiors
|
furniture
|
Covestro
|
coating
|
indoor interiors
|
walls
|
Ashland
|
plywood/particle board
|
landscaping
|
gardens
|
Acme-Hardesty
|
herbicides
|
landscaping
|
gardens
|
Marrone Bio Innovation
|
herbicides
|
landscaping
|
gardens
|
Mitsui
|
herbicides
|
office
|
packaging
|
Acme-Hardesty
|
plastics
|
office
|
packaging
|
Mitsubishi
|
plastics
|
vehicles
|
body
|
Arkema
|
plastics
|
vehicles
|
body
|
DowDupont
|
plastics
|
vehicles
|
body
|
DSM
|
plastics
|
vehicles
|
body
|
Teijin
|
plastics
|
vehicles
|
coatings
|
BASF Covestro
|
hardener
|
vehicles
|
interiors
|
BASF
|
polyurethane foam
|
vehicles
|
tires
|
DowDupont Goodyear
|
bio isoprene
|
work clothes
|
various
|
Archroma
|
various
|
work clothes
|
various
|
Arkema
|
various
|
work clothes
|
various
|
BASF
|
polyamides
|
work clothes
|
various
|
DowDupont
|
various
|
work clothes
|
various
|
Virent
|
polyester
|
A 2015 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) report
(click here to read the report – PDF file) provides details on the biobased products
marketplace in the United States, including the Federal Government’s procurement
program for buying biobased products.
Although the report indicates that key environmental benefits of the manufacture
and use of biobased products are the reduction in fossil fuel use and
associated greenhouse gas emissions, amounts of these benefits and reductions are
not available.
In Part I of this two-part series (see above for reference to
Part I), I indicated the lack of measured results for the reduction of carbon
dioxide emissions caused by the biobased product use of the biggest US city procurement
departments. It seems to me that this
lack is missing a huge opportunity to obtain useful data on how well cities are
doing in reducing carbon dioxide emissions (estimates are that the world’s
cities cause 70% of carbon dioxide emissions).
As indicated by the 2015 USDA report, referenced above, such data is not
available in the literature. Perhaps if
such data was available, the data would lead to more innovation and a significant
reduction of carbon dioxide emissions.
No comments:
Post a Comment