Dozens of chemically-related companies’ sustainability reports
were searched to find quantities of waste generated by the companies and the
percentage of that waste recycled/reused (reuse is usually generating heat from
the waste). Such data was found for 34 companies
and this data is presented in the following table:
company
|
recycled and thermally recovered waste (mt)
|
total waste generated (mt)
|
% of the total waste that is recycled and
thermally recovered
|
methanex
|
1,500
|
3,340
|
45%
|
orica
|
7,300
|
18,200
|
40%
|
altana
|
18,021
|
28,204
|
64%
|
iff
|
18,665
|
38,867
|
48%
|
borealis
|
45,892
|
59,600
|
77%
|
givaudan
|
47,771
|
61,805
|
77%
|
kaneka
|
37,000
|
63,000
|
59%
|
symrise
|
18,160
|
63,550
|
29%
|
linde
|
22,374
|
67,800
|
33%
|
mexichem
|
12,359
|
72,700
|
17%
|
nippon shokubai
|
39,633
|
80,044
|
50%
|
shin etsu
|
71,000
|
101,000
|
70%
|
mitsubishi
|
50,000
|
130,200
|
38%
|
yara
|
49,176
|
81,300
|
60%
|
asahi glass
|
147,754
|
148,000
|
100%
|
lubizol
|
55,500
|
153,000
|
36%
|
wacker
|
123,550
|
167,140
|
74%
|
henkel
|
151,000
|
179,000
|
84%
|
covestro
|
50,080
|
193,000
|
26%
|
dsm
|
170,000
|
202,000
|
84%
|
monsanto
|
185,600
|
227,000
|
82%
|
lg chem
|
156,622
|
251,516
|
62%
|
merck kgaa
|
160,000
|
254,000
|
63%
|
asahi kasei
|
333,600
|
339,000
|
98%
|
mitisubishi
|
204,000
|
340,000
|
60%
|
tosoh
|
418,468
|
419,850
|
100%
|
dupont
|
149,723
|
465,640
|
32%
|
evonik
|
296,000
|
512,000
|
58%
|
bayer
|
214,000
|
840,000
|
25%
|
israel chemical
|
855,540
|
882,000
|
97%
|
formosa petrochemical
|
1,214,062
|
1,259,273
|
96%
|
scg chemicals
|
1,373,000
|
1,376,000
|
100%
|
basf
|
1,674,800
|
2,120,000
|
79%
|
average
|
253,702
|
339,334
|
63%
|
standard deviation
|
|
|
25%
|
The data shows that on average the 34 companies recently generated
339,334 metric tons (mt) per year of waste, while recycling/reusing on average
253,702 mt, an average 63% of the waste being recycled/reused. The data suggests to me that chemical companies
have active, successful programs to recycle/reuse the waste they generate. These programs follow globally-wide
standards for collection and reporting data.
The development of these standards has been ongoing for a long
time. It seems to me that such standards
do well for company sustainability what accounting standards have done for promoting
company financial successes.
The United States Chamber of Commerce Foundation has a
report on how companies benefit by recycling and reusing waste versus landfilling
and/or incinerating the waste. (Click here
to read the report – pdf file.) A report
from General Motors provides how the company has managed to recycle 85 percent
of its worldwide manufacturing waste. (click
here to read the report – pdf file.) A McKinsey
Company article focuses on company reductions of materials and energy use, including
waste material use. (Click here to go to
this article.)
No comments:
Post a Comment